<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s no such thing as a blogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers no longer exist &#124; Australian Top News</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-7068</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers no longer exist &#124; Australian Top News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-7068</guid>
		<description>[...] rest of the post is well worth a read.     I&#8217;m off making changes to my business cards right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rest of the post is well worth a read.     I&#8217;m off making changes to my business cards right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Andre,

I appreciate your comment and yes, I'm splitting hairs. I do think, for example, that a journalist who files reports via a blog, is a journalist first. A lot of the tension between traditional journalism, blogging, and public relations comes from the idea that somehow being online (a blogger vs. a reporter) changes the rules. By going one level deeper, below "blogger," it is easier to understand who someone is, why they are writing, and what standards, if any, exist for their writing.

Despite my contrarian stance on this I still find myself using the term "blogger" to describe people. There's no escaping it in some contexts. I am pleased to see all of the discussion the post has generated, which was of course the intent of taking such a stand. 

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andre,</p>
<p>I appreciate your comment and yes, I&#8217;m splitting hairs. I do think, for example, that a journalist who files reports via a blog, is a journalist first. A lot of the tension between traditional journalism, blogging, and public relations comes from the idea that somehow being online (a blogger vs. a reporter) changes the rules. By going one level deeper, below &#8220;blogger,&#8221; it is easier to understand who someone is, why they are writing, and what standards, if any, exist for their writing.</p>
<p>Despite my contrarian stance on this I still find myself using the term &#8220;blogger&#8221; to describe people. There&#8217;s no escaping it in some contexts. I am pleased to see all of the discussion the post has generated, which was of course the intent of taking such a stand. </p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Natta</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Natta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>It's a good post and it raises some really good points, though I'd say that you're trying to split hairs on the issue. A blog is a tool, and the sooner people realize that the tool can be manipulated in several different ways, the better.

We love labels though; it's what makes us who we are. Otherwise we wouldn't have journalists, reporters, authors, poets, etc. They use the tools, or rules in their cases, to achieve a style and convey a message. There are a lot of people who have a blog, but there are only a few that really get what it means to use it as a tool, infusing audio, video, pictures and links when needed to help aid a story.

If it was as simple as calling everyone writers, we wouldn't have seen this post over on bloggerheads.tv/NYTimes today. 

&lt;a href="http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=98b4e5780bdd4c1675f34e3d811f1b3e2654ae83" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bloggingheads: Are Blogs Bad for us?, The New York Times, 6.3.2008&lt;/a&gt; . Unfortunately, I have a feeling that folks may never truly be satisfied...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good post and it raises some really good points, though I&#8217;d say that you&#8217;re trying to split hairs on the issue. A blog is a tool, and the sooner people realize that the tool can be manipulated in several different ways, the better.</p>
<p>We love labels though; it&#8217;s what makes us who we are. Otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t have journalists, reporters, authors, poets, etc. They use the tools, or rules in their cases, to achieve a style and convey a message. There are a lot of people who have a blog, but there are only a few that really get what it means to use it as a tool, infusing audio, video, pictures and links when needed to help aid a story.</p>
<p>If it was as simple as calling everyone writers, we wouldn&#8217;t have seen this post over on bloggerheads.tv/NYTimes today. </p>
<p><a href="http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=98b4e5780bdd4c1675f34e3d811f1b3e2654ae83" rel="nofollow">Bloggingheads: Are Blogs Bad for us?, The New York Times, 6.3.2008</a> . Unfortunately, I have a feeling that folks may never truly be satisfied&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dataceptionist</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dataceptionist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>I've never thought of myself as a "proper blogger" I always thought of people that managed to get paid to blog as "bloggers". Blogging has always been something I did mostly for myself and whoever else managed to stumble upon my posts.
I think this is a really interesting viewpoint you have here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never thought of myself as a &#8220;proper blogger&#8221; I always thought of people that managed to get paid to blog as &#8220;bloggers&#8221;. Blogging has always been something I did mostly for myself and whoever else managed to stumble upon my posts.<br />
I think this is a really interesting viewpoint you have here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>[...] Joel Postman states &#8216;there&#8217;s no such thing as a blogger.&#8217; He argues that because the blogosphere is bombarded with a diverse crowd of users and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joel Postman states &#8216;there&#8217;s no such thing as a blogger.&#8217; He argues that because the blogosphere is bombarded with a diverse crowd of users and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarbaraKB</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>BarbaraKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>My particular problem with term "blogger" is often *mistaken* for "writer" or even worse "journalist." Joel is trying to further the discussion about the use of the word. A bold post. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My particular problem with term &#8220;blogger&#8221; is often *mistaken* for &#8220;writer&#8221; or even worse &#8220;journalist.&#8221; Joel is trying to further the discussion about the use of the word. A bold post. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Orkin</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Orkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-blogger/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree.  Words can be used as tools, and as we have seen, many people have been able to use their words to make a profit, much like a tradeskill.  So, yes, people can be called Bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree.  Words can be used as tools, and as we have seen, many people have been able to use their words to make a profit, much like a tradeskill.  So, yes, people can be called Bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

