<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Blogging Killing Good Writing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socializedpr.com/is-blogging-killing-good-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/is-blogging-killing-good-writing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dominiq</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/is-blogging-killing-good-writing/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>dominiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/?p=690#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Good to see you post on my favorite topic ;-).

There is indeed something going on relative to language and the social web.

My reading is that with the information overload, people stopped writing for the universal reader (i,e to be understood) but to be differentiated by the people that matter aka their community.

So to me, language is sliding on the descriptive side. Look at lolspeak as a rather striking although extreme example.

The side effects are huge (and as a startup that where our R&#38;D and IP are focused):

- There is no www anymore, no English dictionary
- Search need to go social
- Semantic web is dead - the complexity of the language is growing faster than the technology to comprehend it and symbolic web is a more realistic next step

- and search marketing has to move down one level and be done at the granularity of communities.

The other side effect is that strategies in social media should not start with keywords ( i.e common e\English keywords) but people and the first step  should be to differentiate community through many different artifacts amongst them is  its language (that includes keywords as symbols and keywords in context).

This is the core of the solution we propose.

Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you post on my favorite topic ;-).</p>
<p>There is indeed something going on relative to language and the social web.</p>
<p>My reading is that with the information overload, people stopped writing for the universal reader (i,e to be understood) but to be differentiated by the people that matter aka their community.</p>
<p>So to me, language is sliding on the descriptive side. Look at lolspeak as a rather striking although extreme example.</p>
<p>The side effects are huge (and as a startup that where our R&amp;D and IP are focused):</p>
<p>- There is no www anymore, no English dictionary<br />
- Search need to go social<br />
- Semantic web is dead - the complexity of the language is growing faster than the technology to comprehend it and symbolic web is a more realistic next step</p>
<p>- and search marketing has to move down one level and be done at the granularity of communities.</p>
<p>The other side effect is that strategies in social media should not start with keywords ( i.e common e\English keywords) but people and the first step  should be to differentiate community through many different artifacts amongst them is  its language (that includes keywords as symbols and keywords in context).</p>
<p>This is the core of the solution we propose.</p>
<p>Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/is-blogging-killing-good-writing/#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/?p=690#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>Good catch, Sean, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch, Sean, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gilligan</title>
		<link>http://www.socializedpr.com/is-blogging-killing-good-writing/#comment-3020</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gilligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socializedpr.com/?p=690#comment-3020</guid>
		<description>I think you need to change one occurrence of 'descriptive' to 'prescriptive' in paragraph 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to change one occurrence of &#8216;descriptive&#8217; to &#8216;prescriptive&#8217; in paragraph 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

