rulururu

Using Facebook Fan Pages Effectively

September 24th, 2009
Filed under: Facebook, Social Networks — joel @ 11:58 am

My latest Talent Zoo Column looks at Facebook Fan Pages and how to make the most of them. Here’s an excerpt:

Several people have told me recently they don’t think their Facebook pages have as many fans as their brand seems to call for. They asked me what they were doing “wrong” and how to improve their pages. One executive compared the “coolness” of his brand to a larger, boring brand that drew many more fans to its Facebook page, and said, “I don’t get it.”

I think one of the issues here is the inflation of language so pervasive in social networking. There’s a big difference between a real fan (short for fanatic) of your company, and someone who decides to “Become a Fan,” which takes the single click of a mouse and may never again involve engagement between the “fan” and the company.

Still, big business is creating fan pages and a study released in January 2009, commissioned by Princeton, N.J.-based interactive marketer Rosetta, found that 59% of the 100 leading retailers, including Best Buy, Kohl’s and Wal-Mart, are using Facebook. In fact, when I made informal inquiries into what companies had the best Facebook pages, large retail brands were most often cited. Victoria’s Secret’s Pink and Whole Foods were both mentioned.

You can read the rest of the article here.

Tags: ,

     
Sphere This

Will Facebook Be the Next AOL?

September 22nd, 2009
Filed under: Social Media — joel @ 10:11 am

Remember AOL? And the plethora of free AOL CDs that filled your mailbox, were inserted into your favorite magazines and maybe even offered at the dry cleaner and the auto parts store? I think Facebook is on its way to becoming the next AOL. Just without CDs.

Chris Hall published an interesting post titled Is Facebook Today’s Internet? Chris contends that Facebook today is similar to the Internet itself circa the 1990s: Everyone’s clamoring to get on. Chris goes on to say, quite rightly, “There is no real customization of Facebook Fan Pages and they all basically do the same thing.”

Similarly, I wrote a piece on Facebook Fan Pages in which I advised people to think of them as company Web pages residing within Facebook. It’s good to be inside Facebook because you have access to its 300 million users and a host of ways for those users to share your content and interact with your page. It’s not so good because, as Chris points out, among other things, options for customization are almost nil. (One expensive option is through custom-built apps but these are beyond the reach of many small companies.)

Add this to the list of ways Facebook is sounding a little like the AOL of yore:

  • Astounding growth in user base with dominant market share
  • Walled garden. (You don’t use apps, you use Facebook apps.)
  • Partially closed operating system. (You can connect with external apps, but only through the Facebook API or Facebook Connect.)
  • Consumers discontent with policies
  • Minimal user customization

AOL, at its peak, had the largest user base of any ISP (Internet Service Provider). Like Facebook, it was the biggest “network” of its day, so users were held captive. Consumers hated Facebook’s Beacon program and changes it made to its Terms of Service. Back in the day, AOL users hated hackers and trolls that wandered the network, and hated even more the difficulty faced when trying to cancel an AOL subscription.

Since AOL had a near monopoly on Internet access, the company didn’t need to worry too much about compatibility. If your favorite application didn’t work with AOL, too bad. It’s the same with Facebook.

Granted, the Facebook Connect and Facebook Apps environments are much more transparent and easier to develop for than was AOL. And we’re talking about two different worlds. But it’s hard not to see that Facebook has become an intellectual property island. Part of its success is due to the limitations placed on users. Graphically, Facebook has a consistent look-and-feel since it has locked up its page layout and design, unlike its ailing former competitor MySpace.

But therein lies the problem. Facebook is too sanitized, too homogeneous. The attributes that made it a success may eventually contribute to its undoing. It may some day be seen not as a social network, but some kind of Orwellian proto-social network.

Tags: , ,

     
Sphere This

McLuhan, Socrates and Edith Wharton On Social Media

September 19th, 2009
Filed under: Social Media — joel @ 1:50 pm

In an effort to better understand the social media phenomenon, it often helps to turn to experts in the field. But I’m not talking about social media gurus or mavens, or people with 20,000 followers on Twitter. I’m referring to smart, articulate people from other fields who have something profound to say that might help us put social media into perspective. And all but one of them are dead.

“Publication is a self-invasion of privacy.” Marshall McLuhan

McLuhan clearly foresaw the whole phenomenon of blogging, Twitter and Facebook status updates. Whenever we publish details about our selves, we have affirmatively decided to invade our own privacy. How much information is too much? Location-based services like Brightkite (which I use regularly) are fun, and useful, but are we giving away too many personal details? Must we give up our privacy?

The merger of our personal and business lives in a single social networking “presence” has its problems, too. Is it really smart to let current and future employers know about a drunken beach party or a bailout from a Mexican jail? More and more we are living our lives out in the open, on the public web, and this has its consequences. It also limits the degree to which we can protest about invasions of privacy.

“Innumerable confusions and a feeling of despair invariably emerge in periods of great technological and cultural transition.” Marshall McLuhan

I’ve taken the liberty of quoting McLuhan twice. He was a brilliant media theorist and so much of what he wrote applies to social media, I could have just used McLuhan quotes.

Social media adoption has certainly been fraught with “innumerable confusions” and despair. Younger people are quick to sign up and give the latest social network or social media site a try, while older people are reluctant, sometimes from lack of interest but other times from timidity.

The median age of the social networker is rising slowly, however. MySpace, once thought to be the domain of teenagers, and Facebook, initially established as a network for high school and university students, both have large numbers of users in the age 45 to 65 bracket, but age continues to be a barrier to both social network and general Internet use. A survey released in June, 2009, by the Pew Research Center, revealed that only 28 per cent of Americans over 65 had used the Internet in the past 24 hours. More respondents indicated they had spoken with family and friends, driven a car, prayed, or read a book or newspaper during the same time period.

On the corporate side, many companies are still reluctant to launch social media initiatives, often because they are afraid of making mistakes. In some cases they are afraid of financial and legal risk, and risk to reputation. And many doubt whether an investment in such initiatives is justified, which leads us to…

“Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.” Albert Einstein

This is one of my favorite quotes, which I used in my book in the section on social media measurement. Quantifying the value of social media initiatives remains a challenge. The value to a brand of a social media presence, whether through a corporate blog, Facebook page or Twitter account, is hard to dispute, but equally hard to measure.

There are multiple benefits to a company that participates in social media. The first and most obvious is that there is improved consumer engagement, and a sense among consumers that the company cares more about them and their needs. The second is that companies who understand social media and social networks can tap into an incredible wealth of consumer data and sentiment. More simply put, they have a new way to find out what consumers think about them. And lastly, with so many companies still reluctant to jump into social media, those that do, and do it correctly, have the opportunity to improve their brand and gain positive coverage by bloggers and journalists.

Traditional web metrics like page views, site visits, etc., are somewhat useful in assessing social media success, but don’t really measure the business value of social media initiatives. More advanced software tools from companies like Radian6, Sysomos, and BuzzLogic and others are helping larger organizations better understand the full impact of their social media initiatives, but this is an emerging area and one that remains a challenge for many companies.

“We are advertis’d by our loving friends.” William Shakespeare

Shakespeare was clearly talking about a strategy for social networking. The language of social networking is misleading. Simply because adding a new contact on Facebook is called “adding a friend,” does not mean we are truly gaining a friend when we do so. And on Twitter, when someone clicks “Follow” in our profile, they are subscribing to our updates, not following us. Jesus had followers. Twitter users have subscribers or connections.

If we ignore the Twitter “get-thousands-of-followers” scams and Follow Friday pyramid schemes and instead focus on developing true friendships, or at least their online equivalent, we will have a much more rewarding social networking experience. We can do this by publishing useful information, offering to help others (and actually helping when called upon to do so), and being friendly. This makes us valued members of an online community and others will want to be around us and will promote us to their friends. These third-party endorsements have the same value here as they do in advertising; they encourage others to associate with us in a way that is a thousand times more credible than if we did it ourselves.

“True originality consists not in a new manner but in a new vision.” Edith Wharton

True originality in social media comes not through expressing one’s self through Twitter last week, and through FriendFeed this week, but with original thinking. What you have to say is much more important than the fact that your company is blogging, or has a Twitter account.

Too often social media insiders obsess about the tools of the trade, the latest piece of software or the cool new social media site, and forget about the importance of new ways of thinking, new philosophies and new solutions to problems.

Originality is so undervalued yet so needed in social media. The most interesting and useful content is original, comprised of the ideas, thoughts and experiences of one person told from that person’s unique point of view. From this emerges new ways of doing things, and new business and communications strategies.

“The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates

While it’s true that the unexamined life is not worth living, I believe in the corollary, that the overly examined life is also not worth living. If we spend too much time analyzing our every waking moment, every thought and achievement, every victory and defeat, then we are chronicling our lives but no longer living them. Nowhere is this more true than with the obsession of relating every detail of our lives through social media. Often this obsession becomes such a distraction that it degrades the quality of our offline lives.

I used to tell my children “no electronic devices at the table” when they brought a Nintendo to the dinner table. Then I got an iPhone, which, in my view, was “different,” until my daughter said, “dad, no electronic devices at the dinner table.”

The Internet is proving increasingly invasive on family life. According to the Associated Press, “28 percent of Americans it interviewed last year said they have been spending less time with members of their households. That’s nearly triple the 11 percent who said that in 2006.”

“Be Here Now.” Baba Ram Dass.

The best advice comes from Baba Ram Dass, the only living expert quoted in this article, whose 1971 book Be Here Now is about many things, including the need to be present now, to exist in the moment. If we’re too obsessed with documenting the moment, what we’re currently doing, we aren’t fully experiencing it. To “be here now” means to set aside the computer and the iPhone and enjoy whatever it is we are doing for its own sake, not for its potential value as something to tweet or blog about.

(This article originally appeared on my Talent Zoo column, Very Public Relations, July 30, 2009.)

Tags: , , , , ,

     
Sphere This

A New Spin on Word of Mouth Marketing

September 17th, 2009
Filed under: Social Media, SocialCorp — joel @ 7:34 pm

Today I went into Border’s and practically talked a guy into buying my book. I was with my wife and daughter, and as we generally do when we visit a book store, we went to the business and marketing section to make sure my book was in stock. My wife found it, took it down from the shelf, and turned it facing out to make it easier to locate for knowledge-hungry book buyers. (After we left, I explained that Borders doesn’t like people doing this.)

A gentleman was browsing the section, so I explained what we were doing and that I had written the book. He took it from the shelf and asked me, “What should I expect to learn if I buy this book?” I gave him a synopsis and said “I was only making conversation. I’m not trying to sell you the book.” He told me he was from Deloitte and that he was looking into social media. He wanted to know if I could recommend a book on personal branding. He asked me what large companies are using social media for, and then he said something about the difficulty of measuring the effect of social media on things like revenue and market capitalization.

It was an interesting experience. I had to leave, so I don’t know whether he bought my book. And I’m not sure hanging around in bookstores and selling the book one-on-one scales very well. There has to be a better way.

Tags: , , ,

     
Sphere This

Could you go social-network-free for one day a week?

September 11th, 2009
Filed under: Social Media, Social Networks — joel @ 7:01 pm

What if the preferences for your favorite social network allowed you to pick one or more “blackout days” during which you could not log on? Could you get by for a full 24 hours, or more, with no access to Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed or any of your other favorite social media tools? (And you can’t cheat and use TweetDeck to access Twitter. The API would be shut down, too.)

Recently I’ve had a handful of big projects and some “real world” interruptions and have been spending very little time online. And I don’t miss it all that much.

I’ve always tried not to be overly consumed by anything electronic. In the acknowledgments to my book, I quote my eight-year-old daughter who told me, when I first started bringing my iPhone into the dining room, “Dad, no electronic devices at the dinner table.”

And seven years ago I got fed up with TV and canceled cable. I have never seen American Idol, Lost, CSI, 24, America’s Next Top Model, etc. and I feel no sense of loss.

I’ve been wondering, what would happen if I just quit social networking altogether? How adversely would it affect the quality of my life and relationships?

Maybe quitting completely is too extreme, so that gave me the idea for the social network blackout day(s) feature. If Twitter or Facebook had the ability to shut you out for one or more days, would you enable it? For how many days? Or is your social networking such an important part of your life that the very suggestion seems wrong?

Tags: , , , ,

     
Sphere This
Next Page »
ruldrurd
© 2008, Socialized PR