rulururu

The mean boys and girls of Web 2.0

January 29th, 2009
Filed under: Ethics, Social Media, Web 2.0 — joel @ 11:40 am

Michael Arrington posted earlier this week about being spat on at the DLD (Digital, Life, Design) Conference in Munich, Germany. Michael, one of Web 2.0’s most influential figures, writes that he has been subject to ongoing abuse, including stalking and death threats against him and his family, and this has caused him to want to take some time out to reflect on his life and career.

I don’t know Michael. A friend of mine told me a very touching story about meeting Michael for the first time, and finding him to be quite engaging and congenial. I do know he is very powerful and while I don’t think he can make or break a company, he can come close. And while I have found some of his tactics mean-spirited and unnecessarily venomous, there is no way anyone can justify the kind of conduct he talks about in his post.

I am increasingly disturbed by the meanness inherent in Web 2.0. Some have made a living out of it. I don’t want to confuse the DLD incident, which took place in person, with online conduct, but I think they are related.

Is the mean-spiritedness of so many people inherent to Web 2.0, or is it a reflection of society at large? I think the ability to hide behind an avatar or pseudonym makes people brazen, and the surreality of the online existence allows us to attack people in a way we would never contemplate were we to meet them in person. To see the very worst products of our society, keep your eyes on the comments the next time you use YouTube and it won’t take long before you spot a string of obscenities.

I’m not sure anything can be done about it (or if you agree it is a problem.) A while ago, I wrote my Social Media Love Manifesto, which I have now posted on a Wetpaint Wiki so that anyone can read it and edit it. Please take a look, make a contribution if you feel like it, and let others know about it. Thank you!

Tags: ,

     
Sphere This

Writing well online

January 23rd, 2009
Filed under: Blogging, Business Communications, Social Media — joel @ 3:44 pm

If you’re in a field like PR, marketing, advertising, or social media, and you have a blog, you have an obligation to write well. Have you ever seen an e-mail from a Blackberry with the signature “Sent from my Blackberry, please excuse the typos.”? My Blackberry signature was “Sent from my Blackberry, but I hope there aren’t any typos, because I’m a professional communicator!”

As a professional communicator, you have to ask yourself just what is it your clients are paying you for, or more simply, what are they buying from you? They are paying you to communicate. That is the literal definition of a professional communicator. And if the product they see in your blog is shoddy, that reflects on you and your company. Your company’s clients, and prospective clients, are constantly observing, and making judgments about, the company’s ability to communicate professionally.

Other than laziness, there are three culprits in the decline in the quality of online writing: e-mail, chat, and SMS. With the introduction of informal online communications, people who generally had to write to a strict set of guidelines were suddenly free to write anything, any way they wanted. No one but your recipient sees your e-mail or IMs goes the argument, so you can relax, and be yourself when you use these tools.

These informal communications tools have given us implied permission for misspellings, incomplete sentences, grammatical lapses, and other abuses of the language. Heap on top of that l33t sp34k and SMS abbreviations and so began the decline and fall of Western civilization.

I feel like I’ve done a stunning job explaining my position (the rant portion of this post), but wouldn’t it be more helpful if I offered some suggestions on how to write better online?* So, herewith I offer just a few hints for improving the writing on your blog.

Go back to the basics: spelling, style, grammar, punctuation, and usage

The fastest way to vastly improve the writing on your blog is to discard the notion that since blogging is “different,” you don’t have to follow the rules. If you write white papers, press releases, briefings, scripts, etc. for clients, you know the tolerance they have (in most cases zero) for bad writing. A professional blog should be written to the same standards you would apply to a final document you would be willing to send to a client.

If you haven’t already done so, get a good dictionary (one with pages and two covers), a thesaurus (you don’t trust Microsoft to give you reliable software, which is their core business, why would you trust them to help you come up with the right word?), a copy of Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style, and some kind of style guide. If you’re at an agency, maybe you use The Chicago Manual of Style (online/book) or the Associated Press Stylebook (online/book). You probably have these in the agency library, and there are online editions of both of these (though you have to pay to use them).

It’s not enough to let your computer identify misspellings for you (see above RE: thesaurus). Read your post carefully prior to publishing it. Check for the right version of its vs. it’s, their vs. they’re, and your vs. you’re.

Save your post as a draft and have someone else in the company look at before you post it. Or paste it into an e-mail and send it to someone to review.

Understand that online writing is different

Writing effectively online is very much like writing off-line with a few exceptions. Off-line word counts of 700 to 1500 hundred for short to medium length documents don’t apply online. (The blog post you are reading is a long one, and thanks for sticking with it this far.) A typical blog post should be 250-500 words. Paragraphs should generally not be of more than five sentences each.

These are just guidelines, and if you’re in control of your writing, know what you’re doing, and how to do it, your writing may take a very different form, but if you’re having trouble, try these limits.

Informal tone is fine when you are writing a blog, and is generally preferable. That means you can write in the first person. And say “sort of” (if you must). And use sentence fragments. Like that. And be conversational. Just don’t write like you’re preparing a grocery list.

Write like “the greats”

You probably know good writing when you see it. Emulate the writing of the people whose work you respect and read most. If you read something and it moves along quickly, maintains your interest, and offers the occasional surprise or unexpected moment of enlightenment, go back and take a minute to figure out what it is about the writing you found so attractive. Now, go write like that.

* I can almost guarantee there are grammatical and style errors in this post. Now that we are expected to churn out thoughtful, well researched essays every day, it is difficult to turn out a piece that is perfect in every respect. But I won’t stop trying.

     
Sphere This

My new gig: enterprise social business strategy for Intridea

January 21st, 2009

I’m really happy that I’ve started work for Intridea, an amazing company doing some great work in enterprise social media. Yoshi Maisami, one of the founders of Intridea, and I started chatting over the holidays. I met with Yoshi, Barg, David, Chris, and many other folks from Intridea in D.C. in December and was impressed by their enthusiasm, and by their exceptional corporate culture.

My title is Chief Enterprise Social Business Strategist. I know it’s a little long (it runs to two lines on our business cards), but we thought it was important to define what I actually do, which is similar to what I have been doing since January 2007, advising large companies and organizations on how to use social media in a way that helps them achieve their communications and business objectives. That’s the basic premise of my book, SocialCorp, and we’ll be applying the SocialCorp philosophy to the work I do at Intridea.

Intridea is deep in social app development and has a team of more than 20 fulltime Rails developers, many of whom were involved in developing the IP behind some of social media’s biggest names. The company has a suite of behind-the-firewall enterprise grade social business apps like microblogging platform Present.ly, the SocialSpring Social Network Platform and the Crowdsound User Feedback Widget.

As a Twitter addict, I’m really excited about Present.ly, which is the official microblogging tool for this year’s SXSW, and we’re pretty proud of that. (More on that soon.) Present.ly isn’t really a competitor to Twitter, but behaves similarly (and features file transfer and other functions Twitter doesn’t have). We use Present.ly internally at Intridea, which was just one more thing that confirmed for me that these guys really get it.

The focus here on my blog will change a little, but I’ll try to be relevant, self-aware and insightful, and I’ll keep the Intridea hype to a minimum, but I really do like the company or I wouldn’t have joined.

You can follow Intridea on Twitter at:

Tags: , ,

     
Sphere This

Can You Control Your Brand, or Just Share It?

January 20th, 2009

New Riders, the publishers of my SocialCorp book, have made available Chapter 4, Can You Control Your Brand, or Just Share It?, on its web site. This chapter looks at a contemporary definition of brand, who “owns” your company’s brand, how to establish corporate identity in a Web 2.0 world, and other issues facing marketers and communicators. Here’s a brief excerpt:

“Any discussion of social media implications to the corporate brand must begin with a definition of brand, and some agreement as to just whether the company can control its brand, manage it, share it, or must give it over to the whims of consumers.

Merriam Webster defines brand as

  • a class of goods identified by name as the product of a single firm or manufacturer.

True, but not very useful for this discussion. David Ogilvy, often called the father of advertising, defined a brand as

  • the intangible sum of a product’s attributes: its name, packaging, and price, its history, its reputation, and the way it’s advertised.

I define a brand as the sum total of our experiences with a company, its products, services, and employees, and the way those experiences shape our perception of the company.”

I hope you’ll take a moment to look at the entire chapter and join the discussion by leaving a comment on the Peachpit (parent of New Riders) site or here. Thanks!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

     
Sphere This

“I” vs. “we” in inspirational rhetoric

January 20th, 2009
Filed under: Social Media — joel @ 11:45 am

I heard a professor of rhetoric speaking yesterday on NPR (unfortunately I cannot recall his name) about the role of the personal pronoun in inspirational speeches. The most memorable speeches are observations about the world at large, and remarks that unify, not observations about the speaker and his or her accomplishments and goals. To identify a speech given at a higher level, one that is not self-centered, simply count the number of times the word “I” is used vs. the number of times “we” occurs.

President Obama used the personal pronoun twice in the introductory paragraph and only once in the body of his inaugural address. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, given at a time when unifying a divided and war ravaged nation was of critical importance, does not include a single “I” nor does it include the word “you.” The pronoun that is used throughout the speech is “we,” which occurs 10 times in Lincoln’s brief remarks. (Meanwhile President Obama used the word “we” over 60 times in his considerably longer address today.)

There are exceptions of course. Possibly the most inspirational speech of all time is Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, in which “I” is used to great effect.

If there is a single, brief word that defines the new administration, it is “we.” Let us hope for at least four years of “we the people.”

Tags: , , , , ,

     
Sphere This
Next Page »
ruldrurd
© 2008, Socialized PR